When Motorola executives
looked at
Turkey in 1998,
they saw riches: a country of 65
million people on
the edge of Europe
with fewer than two million cellphone
subscribers. Only two companies
had been granted wireless licenses by the
Turkish government, and one of them, Telsim,
needed suppliers. Motorola quickly
cut a deal. Says Ed Hughes, the company's
finance director: "Motorola and other
competitors saw Turkey as an enormous
opportunity, and we went for it."
Four years later the Schaumburg, Ill.,
company's visions of Turkish riches have dissolved
into allegations of betrayal, fraud-
even of murder threats. Not that you'll see
any of this in Motorola's latest quarterly re
port.
"During the 'telecom boom' that
peaked in late 2000," it reads, "numerous
wireless equipment makers, including the
company, made loans to customers, some of
which were very large." Very large indeed.
Try $2 billion in cash and equipment to a
company Motorola never fully vetted. And
it wasn't alone in its folly. The Finnish wireless
maker Nokia kicked in another $700
million to Telsim. Now neither one can get
its money back.
The case is playing out
in federal court in Manhattan,
where Motorola
and Nokia are accusing
members of the family that
controls Telsim, the Uzans,
of hoodwinking them in an
elaborate racketeering
scheme. A trial is expected
early next year. "Every preliminary
indication is that the defendants,
behind a facade of legitimacy, engaged in repeated
acts of fraud and chicanery, and
thereby perpetrated, and continue to perpetrate,
a rather massive swindle," wrote
U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff after six days
of pretrial hearings this spring.
Murat Hakan Uzan, the CEO of Telsim,
denies the allegations of fraud and says he
wants to repay the loans. Telsim defaulted,
he says, because the Turkish
economy crashed after
a catastrophic earthquake
in 1999, followed by a fi
nancial crisis in early 2001. "In my conscience,
before God, I don't think that this
case can be ever against us," Hakan told
FORTUNE. Motorola and Nokia "took
substantial risk with billions of dollars" in
an emerging market, he says. "But rather
than portray the truth of the picture, they
want to cover up their own decisions."
The Uzans are one of Turkey's richest,
most powerful clans. Family patriarch Kemal,
70, started with a construction business
in the 1950s, which he expanded into
a banking and media empire, now run by
his sons, Cem Cengiz, 42, and Murat Hakan,
34. The family fortune is estimated at
$1.3 billion, with more than 130 businesses
in nine countries. But the Uzans have a history
of deals gone sour-including disputes
with Siemens and
Saatchi & Saatchi-
and scores of lawsuits
pending against their
companies.
In their eagerness
to do deals at the
height of the telecom
boom, Motorola and
Nokia gave Telsim loan on top of loan, hoping
for a big payoff. They weren't the only
companies playing at being banks. A 2001
report by McKinsey & Co. found that the
nine largest telecoms had $26 billion in vendorfinancing loans outstanding, much of it
to troubled startups.
How Motorola and Nokia ended up giving
$2.7 billion to the Uzans is a story that
anyone who has kissed a stranger at a bar after
having had too much to drink will understand.
The deal cut in London in 1998
made Motorola the exclusive supplier to
Telsim in exchange for $360 million in
equipment financing and $200 million to
purchase Telsim's wireless license. As collateral,
Motorola was pledged a 51% stake
in the company. Hakan Uzan assured Motorola
executives they had a hot property.
"Let's not kid ourselves by thinking that
there is a financial exposure on your part,"
Hakan wrote in a Feb. 24, 1999, e-mail to
Hughes that is part of the court record. Telsim,
he said, had just received a written offer
for $3.5 billion from a major European
telecom company.
In February 2000, Motorola loaned Telsim
another $450 million and increased its
collateral to a 66% stake. By that spring
Nokia was also deeply involved, eventually
receiving 7.5% of Telsim's stock as
collateral for $700 million.
But neither Motorola nor Nokia ever
conducted a proper review of Telsim's fi-
nances. Motorola spokesman Scott Wyman
says the company did "considerable
due diligence." But Motorola did not get
Telsim's audited 1999 reports until April
2000, by which time it had loaned the company
$1.3 billion. Even then, many questions
were unanswered. "We had asked a
couple times if we could send in auditors,"
says Hughes, in the first interview a Motorola
executive has given on the debacle.
"[Hakan] refused. We asked if we could
talk to his auditors. He refused on that."
The wireless makers allege that the Uzans
went to great lengths to keep their finances
secret. Once, in 1999, Hakan burst in on
Hughes as he was dining at an Istanbul restaurant
with auditors from Deutsche Bank,
who were reviewing Telsim for a European
export bank. Hakan
claimed the auditors
had taken internal
documents without
permission and
barred them from
Telsim's offices.
Motorola also alleges
the Uzans
never intended to find a buyer for Telsim.
In September 2000, Merle Gilmore, then
chief of Motorola's wireless division, flew
to Istanbul to meet Hakan. According to
the complaint, Gilmore told Hakan, "in
substance, CEO to CEO, eyeball to eyeball,
'I need your commitment that you will
do everything in your power to sell the
company or raise capital from alternative
sources.'" Hakan said yes, and Motorola
loaned Telsim another $700 million.
In all this time, Motorola and Nokia had
never talked to each other about Telsim.
When they finally did in early 2001, says
Ernst Kramer, the Nokia executive who
helped negotiate the company's financing,
"it became totally clear what was happening.
We went through the events, and their
story is practically identical to our story."
In hindsight, both companies suspect the
Uzans used part of the loans to expand
Telsim and the rest to prop up their banks.
Motorola and Nokia also discovered that
the Uzans held a secret shareholders meeting
in Switzerland at which they tripled the
number of Telsim shares. That watered
down Motorola's collateral to 22% and
Nokia's to 2.5%. The Uzans say that the
money sent to the banks went to repay
loans, and that the new shares were issued
to guard against a hostile takeover.
When the two companies threatened the
Uzans with legal action in the summer of
2001, the Uzans filed a criminal complaint
in Turkey, charging senior executives of
Motorola and Nokia with threats of kidnapping
and murder. The Uzans claimed
that after the cellphone companies hired
investigative firm Kroll, family members
received threatening phone calls and were
followed. The complaint, which resulted in
an indictment, accuses the executives of an
"armed threat to kill." Motorola and Nokia
dismiss the charges as absurd and are fighting
them in Turkish court.
In January, Motorola and Nokia filed a
RICO suit in the Southern District of New
York accusing the Uzans of conspiracy to
commit fraud. In April, Judge Rakoff issued
an injunction freezing $30 million of
real estate owned by the Uzans in New York
and ordering them to turn over the disputed
shares, valued at $1.5 billion, to the stewardship
of the court. The Uzans refused.
Lawsuits in Turkey filed by three of their
suppliers prevented them from turning over
a controlling share of a Turkish company to
foreigners, they said. But Rakoff found the
Turkish suits were in "substantial measure
the product of collusion" between Telsim
and the suppliers, which did all their business
with Telsim. One supplier was run by
an Uzan first cousin.
In August, Rakoff found the Uzans in
criminal and civil contempt for refusing to
turn the disputed shares over to the court.
Hakan in particular, he noted, had played
an "obstructionist and deceptive role."
The judge ordered the defendants to pay
an escalating fine, doubling each month,
until they complied. Meanwhile, a court in
England granted Motorola a worldwide
hold on $200 million of the Uzans' assets.
Motorola and Nokia have been seeking
diplomatic solutions as well. They hired
Mark Paris, a former U.S. ambassador to
Turkey, to push their case and asked the
Bush administration to press the Turkish
government on the issue. Even that may
not help. Turkey's government is in danger
of collapse, and Hakan's brother, Cem, is
running for Prime Minister.
Motorola and Nokia were right about one
thing: Turkey's cellphone market is taking
off. Despite financial problems, Telsim has
grown from 500,000 subscribers in 1998 to
6.5 million today. But even if Motorola and
Nokia prevail in court, they might not benefit.
"I doubt they are going to recover any
meaningful amount of money," says Woytek
Uzdelewicz, a telecom analyst at Bear
Stearns. Indeed, both companies have already
written off the full amount of the
loans. Maybe there should be an entry in the
accounts: tuition for lessons learned.