A case in point was last Saturday, when thousands of
people packed into a Porto Alegre theatre at 8.30 a.m. to
hear five of Latin America's most admired writers and
intellectuals talk about globalisation and other problems
of the world.
The eager fans had formed kilometres-long queues and
fought their way through the entrances, finally filling the
stairs and aisles when all the seats were taken. They
might as well have been going to a rock concert.
But when the talking finally began, amidst all of the
cheering, it was hard to see what the fuss was about.
The theme of the talk was "Quixote today: Utopia and
Politics", and led to lots of mushy thinking.
Predictably, the panellists, which included Nobel Prizewinning
author Jos Saramago and World Social Forum
founder Ignacio Ramonet, went to great lengths to define
the word "utopia", extolling the virtues of Don Quixote's
valorous madness, and denouncing the International
Monetary Fund for not being a democratically-elected
institution. The crowd loved it.
But while populist rhetoric (or in this case postmodern/
romantic/populist rhetoric) is good for pumping up
crowds, it is like fast food in that it does not leave one
with much in the way of substance. For that, one had to
sit through the much smaller and far more mundane
meetings being held in small, stuffy tents.
Even then, finding the right workshop took lots of sifting.
"Lots of the meetings are ideological. They talk about the
bad things in the world, but they don't talk about
solutions," said Elise Christensen, a 24-year-old
Norwegian who was attending the forum for the first
time.
Much more useful, she said, were the panels that
address specific subjects. As an example, she cited a
presentation from that day about the growing trend,
often supported by international lenders like the IMF, of
privatising water in Third World countries. At the panel,
Uruguayan activists described how they were able to
pass a constitutional amendment securing water as a
public right.
That the stuff of the World Social Forum varies so much
between the ethereal and the concrete is a problem as
old as the Left itself.
Brazilian President Ignacio Lula da Silva - a man who
knows the dangers of dogma, having angered the left
wing of his own party by playing the IMF's austerity game
- warned in October that the World Social Forum was
"becoming a bazaar of ideological products, where
everyone buys and sells whatever they feel like".
When the meetings started five years ago they were
focused almost totally on globalisation and free trade.
The organisers consciously broke from that at last year's
conference in Mumbai, India, said Shalmali Gultal, a
development and poverty researcher and one of the
forum's organisers. The organisers felt the meetings had
been too dominated by elites and experts, and decided
the best way to deal with that was to abdicate much of
their oversight role, opening the forum meetings to
whomever wanted to present.
"The World Social Forum is a reflection of the state of
civil society," she said. "It doesn't necessarily need to
have a sharp focus."
Which is fine in theory. In practice, this correspondent
spent half an hour looking for a meeting on child
trafficking that was to take place in tent K604, but this
was renamed K609 and was, when found, housing
something called the African Women's Court.
Even the old foundation of the forum, anti-globalisation,
is due for a reassessment. The term itself, globalisation,
is now practically meaningless, having come to stand for
everything from multinational corporations, Third World
debt, McDonald's, and President Bush's war in Iraq.
One union activist sees the lowering of old national
boundaries and the revolution in communication as an
opportunity. "We have to globalise to compete against
multinationals," said Patrick van Klink, a worker and
union organiser at the Unilever margarine factory in
Rotterdam.
Over the last five years, his union has forged links with
Unilever workers in India and Brazil, sometimes providing
them with strategic advice, publicity and funding. "The
possibilities for us as a workers' movement are better
than ever before - it is easier to travel, communicate, and
meet face to face. We have to take advantage of these
opportunities."
It is an amazing thing when thousands of people - most
of university age - turn out for five days of political
discussion. It is inspiring that these masses treat
novelists with the admiration usually reserved for pop
stars.
And all of this has been happening in a country which,
like many of its neighbours, recently replaced corrupt and
repressive regimes with politicians who, like President
Lula, seem to be committed and serious reformers.
On the first night of the forum a student named Mario, in
the midst of a discussion on the problems of the world,
was clearly feeling frustrated. "So what should we do?"
he asked. Five days and hundreds of workshops later,
maybe he got some ideas.