WASHINGTON - Arrayed in bright orange T-shirts bearing the logo "I am
Arthur Andersen," hundreds of the accounting firm's employees gathered on the
steps of the Capitol yesterday in the chill overcast morning to protest the firm's
indictment for its role in the Enron scandal.
The assembled employees - accountants, auditors, consultants and clerical
workers - complained that the Department of Justice had disgraced their 85,000-
person firm, though just a small fraction of Andersen employees worked on the
Enron Corp. account.
"A few people did something, and we're all being punished for it," said Chrystal
Furlong, a tax manager who has worked at Andersen's office in Vienna, Va., for
six years.
Amid the chants, anger and testimonials at yesterday's rally, which began at 7
a.m. in front of the nearly empty Capitol, no one spoke openly about the
likelihood of Andersen's demise and the prospect that the firm's 28,000 U.S.
employees would lose their jobs. Rather than reflect on that possibility, those at
the rally preferred to speak of their allegiance to the company.
"This shows that everyone is behind the company," said Brad Turner, a senior
consultant. "People aren't jumping ship."
Similar rallies have taken place in Houston and Philadelphia; others are planned
for Los Angeles, Chicago, New York and Atlanta. Yesterday's gathering brought
more than 500 Andersen employees and their families from the District of
Columbia and Northern Virginia, and about 80 from Baltimore.
The rally's organizer, Marc Andersen, acknowledged that the firm paid for the Tshirts
and the cost of busing in employees but said the impetus for the rally came
from the employees.
Andersen, who is not related to the firm's founder, is a Virginia-based partner in
charge of sales and marketing for the Southeastern United States.
In Washington, the mood at the early-morning gathering was one of defiance.
Carl Berquist, a company partner, led the crowd in a chant of "We are Arthur
Andersen!"
"I haven't done something like this since college," Berquist told the audience.
To enhance the feel of a pep rally, the crowd held up pom-poms and signs that
read, "Do I look like a criminal?" "We are victims too," and "Don't indict my
Daddy."
Others spoke of their anger at the Justice Department, their anguish at explaining
the indictment to their families and their loyalty to Andersen management.
Largely unmentioned was the specter of unemployment facing the assembled
crowd.
"I'm not even considering getting a new job right now," said Furlong, the tax
manager.
Cynthia Leonard, a mail assistant in the Vienna office who has been with the
firm for about two years, said, "I have faith that God is going to show us the
right way to go, and we're not going to lose our jobs."
Finding a new job would be easier for the firm's senior members, said Roque
Santi, a tax partner. "But support staff will suffer. The jobs available to us are not
like what they are going to have," Santi said.
Those at the rally made a point of distancing themselves from the Enron scandal.
When one of the speakers asked who in the crowd had worked on the Enron
account, nobody raised a hand.
"I'd never even heard of Enron until this happened," said Kelley Waller, an
executive assistant at the firm's D.C. office.
Justice Department officials said they decided to seek an indictment of the firm
for shredding thousands of documents linked to Enron. They also noted a
pattern of misconduct at Andersen involving other accounts. The document
shredding that led to the obstruction of justice charge was apparently
orchestrated by partners at the firm and occurred in four cities. "There's not a lot
of anger at the people in Houston because we don't know all of the details," said
Jennifer Knepley, who works in marketing at Andersen's Baltimore office. But,
she added, "I think there's disappointment also, because we've always felt we're
a firm with a lot of integrity, so there's disappointment that one of our own
could do that."
The rally ended a few minutes after 8 a.m. with a final cheer and a group picture
on the Capitol steps. Then, as the sun finally peeked through the clouds, the
scores of assembled tax managers, consultants and auditors pealed off their Tshirts
to reveal business suits underneath, and, clutching their cell phones, went
off to work.
Later in the day, in a marble-paneled hearing room, Harvey L. Pitt, chairman of
the Securities and Exchange Commission, met with the Senate Banking
Committee to discuss what had gone wrong with the accounting profession and
how best to fix it.
Pitt politely batted down Democratic proposals to increase federal oversight of
auditors, contending that such regulations were heavy-handed. The most
effective regulation, Pitt said, could come only from within the private sector.
Pitt, a lawyer who worked for the Big 5 accounting firms before heading the
SEC, said he consulted with the firms' chief executive officers in formulating his
proposals.
Sen. Paul S. Sarbanes, a Maryland Democrat who is chairman of the committee,
acknowledged Pitt's concerns about the dangers of too much federal regulation.
But in light of the Enron scandal, Sarbanes said, now might be the time for the
government to draw some "bright lines" to protect against conflicts of interests
for accounting firms.