WASHINGTON - The Bush administration and Senate
Republicans have assembled an unconventional
coalition to try to rally popular support for their
energy bill, which includes a contentious plan to
open up the protected Arctic National Wildlife
Refuge in Alaska to oil drilling.
The improbable allies include B'nai B'rith and the
Veterans of Foreign Wars, the Teamsters and the
National Black Chamber of Commerce, the National
Association of Manufacturers and the Seafarers'
International Union. Supporters say they stand a
better chance of success if they can show that
their plan enjoys broad support and does not simply
serve the interests of the oil industry.
"The B'nai B'rith leadership has been viewing this
issue from a national security perspective," said
Jason Epstein, the organization's director of
legislative affairs.
"We need to do whatever is necessary to ensure that
the United States acts decisively overseas in the
war against terrorism. And that means doing more to
promote energy and independence."
At a meeting at the White House on Monday morning,
President Bush, Republican Sen. Frank H. Murkowski
of Alaska and Interior Secretary Gale A. Norton
called on veterans groups to ramp up their lobbying
campaign to promote drilling in the wildlife refuge
in the name of national security.
Supporters hope that their alliance - in which oil
companies are maintaining a low profile - will
pressure the Senate's Democratic majority to bring
the issue to a vote in coming weeks. The energy
bill passed the House last year.
The Bush administration and Murkowski had long
pushed to open the environmentally sensitive Arctic
refuge to drilling. But the issue gained momentum
in the wake of the attacks of Sept. 11, with many
Republicans saying that reducing U.S. dependence on
foreign oil would, in effect, aid the war on
terrorism.
Tapping the oil in Alaska would drastically reduce
the need for imports from the Persian Gulf,
according to David Woodruff, a spokesman for
Murkowski. Roughly 14 percent of the oil the United
States consumes each day comes from the gulf.
Claims of inflated figures
But opponents in Congress and environmental groups
express grave concerns that exploration and
drilling would mar one of the country's last
untouched wilderness areas. The threat to the
environment is not justified, they argue, because
the supporters' projection that the refuge contains
up to 10 billion barrels of recoverable oil is
overblown.
The most recent report from the U.S. Geological
Survey bolsters the opponents' point. The survey
estimates that the Arctic refuge contains slightly
more than 3 billion barrels of oil that it would be
cost-effective to extract. The nation consumes
about 7 billion barrels of oil a year. Even if the
drilling plan were approved, production would not
begin until at least 2010.
With Congress going into recess next week, the
veterans groups are launching an aggressive grassroots
lobbying campaign targeting lawmakers who are
still on the fence. The two largest veterans
groups, the American Legion and the Veterans of
Foreign Wars, together claim nearly 5 million
members.
List of targeted senators
At the White House meeting Monday, the veterans
groups were given a list of senatorial targets:
Sens. Gordon H. Smith of Oregon, Richard G. Lugar
of Indiana, John McCain of Arizona and Arlen
Specter of Pennsylvania, all Republicans; and
Robert C. Byrd of West Virginia, Hillary Rodham
Clinton of New York, Blanche Lambert Lincoln of
Arkansas and Jon Corzine of New Jersey, all
Democrats.
"When the members are relaxing in their offices and
focusing on their elections over the break, then
the Legionnaires that are in their local districts
or states will come into their office with the same
message," said Peter Gaytan, deputy legislative
director for the American Legion. "It's very
effective."
The Republicans can also claim support from Sen.
John B. Breaux, a Louisiana Democrat who frequently
sides with oil and gas interests, as well as
several conservative senior citizen groups, and
Latino and African-American business groups.
Opponents say the broad support the Republicans are
claiming is exaggerated and that much of their
backing has come from passing on overly optimistic
figures about the amount of oil available in the
refuge.
"What they are doing is, they are giving these
people misleading information," said Elliot Negin,
a spokesman for the Natural Resources Defense
Council, one of many environmental groups that
oppose the bill.
Negin noted that most unions and Jewish groups have
either come out against drilling in the refuge or
have taken no position.
Nathan Diament, the Washington director of the
Union of Orthodox Congregations of America, which
favors drilling, said his group was courted by the
Republicans, notably Murkowski and Sen. Rick
Santorum of Pennsylvania.
"Senators Murkowski and Santorum were eager and
interested in having support from the Jewish
community," Diament said. "They have been
encouraging Jewish groups to get involved for some
time."
The one group conspicuously absent from the debate
has been the energy industry. An oil lobbyist who
spoke on condition of anonymity explained why the
industry was not openly pushing for drilling.
"The decision was made based on a lot of experience
that it wasn't going to happen with just the
industry's voice," the lobbyist said. "A lot of
times you won't see an oil industry name, but we
are putting a lot of resources behind it.
"It's a classic thing: how best to deliver your
message. The best news we got last year was that
the trade unions and the farm groups cared, and
that's been very, very effective."